| 翻訳と辞書 |
| National Labor Relations Board v Hearst Publications, Inc ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
National Labor Relations Board v Hearst Publications, Inc
''National Labor Relations Board v Hearst Publications, Inc'' is a US labor law case, concerning the scope of protection for employees under the National Labor Relations Act 1935.
==Facts==
Newsboys, who distributed papers on the streets of the city of Los Angeles, formed a union to collectively bargain over wages. They claimed they were ‘employees’ under the National Labor Relations Act 1935. They alleged their employers were Hearst Publications Inc, which owned the Los Angeles Examiner and the Los Angeles Evening Herald and Express, as well as the Los Angeles Times. The National Labor Relations Board determined that the newsboys were employees, as they worked continuously, regularly and relied on their earnings to support themselves and their families. The publishers dictated the buying and selling prices, fixed their markets, controlled their supply of papers, supervised their work hours and effort, and gave them sales equipment for the publishers’ benefit. The NLRB then designated the full-time newsboys and ‘checkmen’ to be a bargaining unit within the city, excluding temporary, casual and part-time newsboys and bootjackers. The newspapers argued that under common law standards, their control over the newsboys made them no more than independent contractors, so that they were not ‘employees’ and had no duty to bargain in good faith under the National Labor Relations Act 1935.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「National Labor Relations Board v Hearst Publications, Inc」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|